Skip Navigation
site index
Artist Concept of the FutureGen Power Plant

Press Releases

May 8, 2008
Contact: Lawrence Pacheco (202) 715-1555

FutureGen chairman urges key Senate committee to continue funding for FutureGen at Mattoon

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The United States is facing an enormous challenge to address climate change, and the FutureGen project at Mattoon, Ill. is a reasonable and necessary investment to advance near-zero emission coal-fueled power technology with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), FutureGen Alliance Chairman Paul Thompson told members of a key Senate panel today.

"We are very mindful of the fact that federal dollars are a limited and valuable resource, but we believe that FutureGen at Mattoon is a good investment for our nation," Thompson said during a hearing in the Senate Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee. "FutureGen at Mattoon offers the opportunity to advance many technologies faster and further than any other project in the world and it would be a huge mistake to move backward on the progress we have already made."

The Department of Energy (DOE) has cited higher costs and a changing marketplace as reasons for restructuring the FutureGen program. Thompson noted that the increase in costs is due to inflation and not scope changes, which DOE acknowledged when they signed the Cooperative Agreement that governs the project in March 2007.

"It is difficult to understand why these costs were acceptable in March 2007, but in January 2008 they formed the primary basis for their proposal to restructure the program. The Alliance is effectively managing costs, is contributing nearly $400 million toward the project and continues to reiterate its offer to the DOE to explore reasonable avenues to mitigate the federal government's exposure," said Thompson. The marketplace for clean coal power plants has changed, but not for the better. There are numerous proposed clean coal power plants, but Thompson noted many of them will not be built due to cost and regulatory uncertainty. In the last year, the number of projects has declined, so the market is not as stable as the DOE has suggested.

Given the lack of clarity in DOE's restructured plan and the five years of delay that would result, Thompson said early action to advance CCS technology through FutureGen at Mattoon is a necessary and wise national policy to address climate change. "DOE's proposal to restructure FutureGen has many business and technical issues and it's under-funded. Making the necessary investments on the front-end to advance the technology is a smart national strategy. We are committed to continuing FutureGen at Mattoon and remain open and willing to work with Congress and the DOE to put the project back on the fast track."

View Thompson's opening remarks (PDF).

View Thompson's testimony (PDF).

###

About the FutureGen Alliance

The FutureGen Alliance, a non-profit organization, represents some of the world's largest coal companies and electric utilities including: American Electric Power, Anglo American, BHP Billiton, the China Huaneng Group, CONSOL Energy Inc., E.ON U.S., Foundation Coal, Luminant, PPL Corporation, Rio Tinto Energy America, Peabody Energy, Southern Company, and Xstrata Coal.. These companies provide energy to tens of millions of residential, business, and industrial customers in North America, Asia, Australia, Europe, Africa and South America. The Alliance is partnering with the U.S. Department of Energy to design and build the facility. Learn more about FutureGen and the Alliance at http://www.FutureGenAlliance.org/.